-
Business consulting
Our business consulting services can help you improve your operational performance and productivity, adding value throughout your growth life cycle.
-
Business risk services
We can help you identify, understand and manage potential risks to safeguard your business and comply with regulatory requirements.
-
Forensic Advisory
At Grant Thornton, we have a wealth of knowledge in forensic services and can support you with issues such as dispute resolution, fraud and insurance claims.
-
Transactional advisory services
We can support you throughout the transaction process – helping achieve the best possible outcome at the point of the transaction and in the longer term.
-
Talent Management
Talent Management
-
Tax advisory and planning
Our teams have in-depth knowledge of the relationship between domestic and international tax laws.
-
Fiscal transactions advisory (Due Diligence)
Fiscal transactions advisory (Due Diligence)
-
Tax returns preparation and review
Tax returns preparation and review
-
Indirect tax recovery
The laws surrounding transfer pricing are becoming ever more complex as tax affairs of multinational companies are facing media, public and regulator scrutiny.
-
International tax
International tax
-
Expats services (Global Mobility)
Through our global organisation of member firms, we support both companies and individuals, providing insightful solutions to minimise tax burdens.
-
Bookkeeping & financial accounting
Effective bookkeeping and financial accounting are essential to the success of forward-thinking organisations.
-
Corporate advisory
We can help you navigate the complexity of the corporate secretarial requirements so you can focus your time and effort on running your business.
-
Payroll
Grant Thornton’s outsourcing teams can manage your payroll commitments on your behalf, allowing you to focus on what you do best – growing your business.
-
Company start-up
Outsourcing your operations and specific business functions to Grant Thornton can not only cut costs, but also bring you new insights and experience.
Currently IAS 27 requires an entity to account for its investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates either at cost or in accordance with IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ (or IAS 39 ‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’ where an entity has not yet adopted IFRS 9).
In responses to the IASB’s 2011 Agenda Consultation, some of the IASB’s constituents noted however that:
- the laws of some countries require listed companies to present separate financial statements prepared in accordance with local regulations
- those local regulations require the use of the equity method to account for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates
- in most cases, the use of the equity method would be the only difference between the separate financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRSs and those prepared in accordance with local regulations.
As a result the Exposure Draft (ED/2013/10) proposes introducing a third option which would allow entities to account for investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates under the equity method. Entities would then have an accounting policy choice in their separate financial statements between accounting:
- at cost
- in accordance with IFRS 9 (or IAS 39)
- under the equity method.
Entities would be required to apply the same accounting for each category of investments. It is proposed that entities would be required to apply the proposed amendments retrospectively. No transitional provisions are considered necessary as the IASB believes entities should be able to use information that is already available to them in applying the proposals.
In our letter, we support the inclusion of the equity method as one of the options to account for an entity’s investments in subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates in the entity’s separate financial statements.
While we acknowledge that there are some concerns with the amendments, we recognise that reinstating this option will reduce the burdens on entities in jurisdictions that require the preparation of separate financial statements and the use of the equity method in those statements. We therefore support the proposals, mainly on pragmatic grounds.